高级检索

    对离子色谱法测定煤炭中氟和氯量中样品处理方法的比较

    Comparative Study on the Methods of Sample Treatment in the IC-Determination of Fluorine and Chlorine in Coal

    • 摘要: 用离子色谱法测定煤炭中氟和氯含量,对样品的两种前处理方法(高温燃烧水解和氧弹燃烧法)的适用性进行比较。选取含氟及氯的煤标准物质,分别用上述两种前处理方法处理后,将所得试液用同样分析条件进行测定。结果表明:①氧弹燃烧法的检出限(3S/N)(F- 0.036 μg·g-1,Cl- 0.099 μg·g-1)低于高温燃烧水解法(F- 0.072 μg·g-1,Cl- 0.198 μg·g-1);②两种方法对氟、氯的测定结果均与标准物质的认定值相符,对氯测定结果的准确度和精密度较高,测定值与认定值之间的相对误差在-1.0%~1.0%之间;③对氟测定,氧弹法结果的准确性低于高温燃烧水解法,前者与认定值的相对误差在-6.5%~-4.0%之间,而后者与认定值的相对误差在0.36%~3.6%之间。但氧弹燃烧法不适用于灰分大于25%的煤样。

       

      Abstract: The adaptability of 2 methods (i.e., Ⅰ. combustion-hydrolysis method and Ⅱ. oxygen bomb method) for pretreatment of coal samples in IC-determination of fluorine and chlorine in coal was comparatively studied. CRM's of coal containing F- and Cl- were used in the testing. The CRM's were treated separately by the 2 methods, and the sample solutions were analyzed by the same procedure for their contents of F- and Cl-. It was shown by the experimental results, that ① the values of detection limit (3S/N) found by method Ⅱ (F- 0.036 μg·g-1, Cl- 0.099 μg·g-1) were lower than those found by method Ⅰ (F- 0.072 μg·g-1, Cl- 0.198 μg·g-1); ② analytical results of F- and Cl- obtained by both of the methods were found in consistency with the certified values of the CRM's, while the results of Cl- were shown to be better in accuracy and precison, as the values of relative error between the results found and the certified values attained in the range within 1.0%; ③ results for F- obtained by method Ⅱ were less accurate than those obtained by method Ⅰ, as in the former case, values of relative error were ranged from -6.5% to -4.0%, and in the letter case, values of relative error were ranged from 0.36% to 3.6%. Furthermore, the method Ⅱ was not suitable for treatment of coal samples with ash contents higher than 25%.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回