Advanced Search
    DAI Ruiping, LI Shenying, LIU Huamei, TANG Lijun. Determination of Mercury in Electrolytic Iron Powder by Hydride Generation Atomic Fluorescence Spectrometry with Matrix Matching[J]. PHYSICAL TESTING AND CHEMICAL ANALYSIS PART B:CHEMICAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 58(6): 634-638. DOI: 10.11973/lhjy-hx202206003
    Citation: DAI Ruiping, LI Shenying, LIU Huamei, TANG Lijun. Determination of Mercury in Electrolytic Iron Powder by Hydride Generation Atomic Fluorescence Spectrometry with Matrix Matching[J]. PHYSICAL TESTING AND CHEMICAL ANALYSIS PART B:CHEMICAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 58(6): 634-638. DOI: 10.11973/lhjy-hx202206003

    Determination of Mercury in Electrolytic Iron Powder by Hydride Generation Atomic Fluorescence Spectrometry with Matrix Matching

    • The sample of electrolytic iron powder was digested hermetically with 50% (φ) nitric acid solution in a boiling water bath. The effect of coexisting ions and electrolytic iron powder matrix on the determination of mercury was studied, and the possible mechanism of the enhancement of mercury atomic fluorescence signal with Fe2+ and Fe3+ was discussed. As shown by the results, Ag+ and Ni2+ could quench the atomic fluorescence signal of mercury, and the quenching effect was stronger with the increasing mass concentration of ions. The mass concentration of Fe2+ and Fe3+ reached 20.0 mg·L-1, which could significantly enhance the atomic fluorescence signal and cold atomic fluorescence signal of mercury. Fe2+ and Fe3+ were reduced to iron atoms in the potassium borohydride system, and the excited iron atoms might transfer energy to mercury atoms to enhance their atomic fluorescence signals. In order to eliminate the above interference, mercury in electrolytic iron powder was determined by hydride generation atomic fluorescence spectrometry with matrix matching. It was shown that linear relationship between atomic fluorescence intensity and mass concentration of mercury was found in the range of 0.400-2.00 μg·L-1, with detection limit (3s) of 0.03 mg·kg-1. Test for recovery was made by standard addition method, giving results in the range of 90.9%-100%, with RSDs (n=6) of the determined values in the range of 2.4%-4.3%. This method could meet the requirements of appendix F in national standard GB/T 27404-2008.
    • loading

    Catalog

      Turn off MathJax
      Article Contents

      /

      DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
      Return
      Return